Skip to content

MariaDB has cleartext password disclosure to a MITM on the initial-handshake

Moderate severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jul 9, 2026 in mariadb-corporation/mariadb-connector-j • Updated Aug 28, 2026

Package

maven org.mariadb.jdbc:mariadb-java-client (Maven)

Affected versions

< 2.7.14
>= 3.0.0, < 3.3.5
>= 3.4.0, < 3.4.3
>= 3.5.0, < 3.5.9

Patched versions

2.7.14
3.3.5
3.4.3
3.5.9

Description

Summary

When a Java application connects with sslMode=verify-full (or verify-ca) and a password but does not pin a server certificate, Connector/J deliberately accepts an untrusted/self-signed certificate at the TLS layer (the "MITM-proof without a CA" feature) and proves the server's identity afterwards by binding the certificate fingerprint into the authentication exchange. That fingerprint enforcement is applied to the OK-packet and auth-switch paths but not to the initial-handshake path. An active man-in-the-middle that presents a self-signed certificate, claims to be MariaDB, and names the initial authentication plugin mysql_clear_password receives the victim's database password in cleartext, before any fingerprint/identity check runs. The connection is torn down a moment later, but the credential is already gone.

Details

For sslMode=verify-full/verify-ca with a password and no serverSslCert/trustStore, the connector falls back to an ephemeral trust manager (default fallbackToSystemTrustStore=true) that accepts any non-expired certificate at the TLS layer and records its fingerprint. Identity is then meant to be enforced via that fingerprint.

The enforcement guard is present on two of the three paths, the OK-packet fingerprint check and the auth-switch handler (where the clear-password plugin is only allowed when the fingerprint is already verified). It is absent on the initial-handshake send: HandshakeResponse.encode() builds the mysql_clear_password response after checking only that SSL is enabled, never consulting the recorded fingerprint, sslMode, or whether the plugin is MITM-proof. By that point the connector already knows the certificate was self-signed. The clear-password plugin does not declare itself MITM-proof (it inherits the safe default), which confirms it is meant to be refused on an unverified certificate; the initial-handshake path simply never consults that flag. The initial path also bypasses restrictedAuth.

Impact

An active man-in-the-middle steals the full cleartext database password of any Java application using Connector/J with sslMode=verify-full/verify-ca plus a password and no pinned certificate, the configuration documented as the easy, secure default. With the captured credentials the attacker can take over the database account and read or modify all data that account is authorized for. The victim takes no unusual action; the developer explicitly enabled TLS verification expecting exactly this protection.

Patches

Fixed in 2.7.14, 3.3.5, 3.4.3, and 3.5.9. Upgrade to the patched release on your branch (3.5.x → 3.5.9, 3.4.x → 3.4.3, 3.0/3.1/3.2/3.3.x → 3.3.5, 2.x → 2.7.14). The fix applies the same certFingerprint != null && !isMitMProof() guard to the initial-handshake path before writing the auth response, refusing to send a mysql_clear_password (or any non-MITM-proof) response on an as-yet-unverified certificate, matching the auth-switch path.

Workarounds

If you cannot upgrade immediately, pin the server certificate (serverSslCert= the real CA / server cert). With a pinned certificate the self-signed certificate of a man-in-the-middle is rejected at the TLS layer before any password is transmitted.

Credit

Reported by haaahaaahiihiiii

References

Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Aug 28, 2026
Reviewed Aug 28, 2026
Last updated Aug 28, 2026

Severity

Moderate

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

EPSS score

Exploit Prediction Scoring System (EPSS)

This score estimates the probability of this vulnerability being exploited within the next 30 days. Data provided by FIRST.
(13th percentile)

Weaknesses

Insufficiently Protected Credentials

The product transmits or stores authentication credentials, but it uses an insecure method that is susceptible to unauthorized interception and/or retrieval. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

CVE-2026-55856

GHSA ID

GHSA-g9jj-cgmh-9f38
Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.