Created and maintained by Nishant Tyagi.
ESLint-style linter for Sigma detection rules. Validates against Sigma 2.1.0, scores rules across six quality dimensions, and emits findings with stable rule IDs that you can cite, suppress, or tune.
Detection teams routinely ship Sigma rules through pull requests, but existing
tooling stops at schema validity. SigmaHQ's sigma-cli check and pySigma
verify that a rule parses; they don't measure whether it is well-attributed
(MITRE ATT&CK alignment), free of common false-positive patterns, redundant
with existing public rules, or stylistically consistent. sigmalint fills that
gap with 22 deterministic quality checks across six dimensions, designed to
run on every PR — the same way ESLint runs on JavaScript or RuboCop runs on
Ruby.
pip install sigmalint-cli
sigmalint lint rules/The PyPI package is named
sigmalint-clibecause the bare namesigmalintwas already taken by an unrelated project. The CLI binary, the Python import (import sigmalint), and the GitHub repository are all namedsigmalint.
Example output:
sigmalint 0.1.4
┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━┳━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓
┃ file ┃ status ┃ score ┃ findings ┃ top findings ┃
┡━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━╇━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┩
│ rules/win_susp_foo.yml │ valid │ 95.8 │ 9 │ FP001 (warning), FP003 │
│ │ │ │ │ (warning), META001a │
│ │ │ │ │ (warning), +6 more │
└─────────────────────────┴────────┴───────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘
files=1 valid=1 invalid=0 findings=9 errors=0 warnings=7 info=2 mean_score=95.82
Every finding has a stable rule ID. sigmalint explain <ID> prints the
full rule documentation — what it checks, why it matters, bad/good
examples, and the fix:
$ sigmalint explain FP001
---
id: FP001
dimension: fp_risk
default_severity: warning
profiles: { strict: warning, sigmahq: warning, local: warning }
---
# FP001 — Single broad selection with no filter
## What it checks
The rule's `detection.condition` is a single, unfiltered selection that
references only one wide-matching predicate (e.g. just `selection`
matching a common process name).
## Why
Such rules typically generate high-volume noise in production
deployments.
## Bad example
detection:
selection: { Image|endswith: '\powershell.exe' }
condition: selection
## Good example
detection:
selection: { Image|endswith: '\powershell.exe' }
filter: { ParentImage|endswith: ['\explorer.exe', '\cmd.exe'] }
condition: selection and not filter
## How to fix
Add a negated `filter`/`filter_*` selector that excludes the common
benign cases, or narrow the selection.
A strict validity gate (Sigma 2.1.0 JSON schema + condition parser) plus six quality dimensions with 22 rules:
ATK###— MITRE ATT&CK technique alignment (4 rules)TAX###— Sigma taxonomy and modifier correctness (3 rules)FP###— false-positive risk heuristics (4 rules)META###— metadata completeness (6 rules)RED###— redundancy with the public SigmaHQ corpus (2 rules)STY###— Sigma interoperability style (3 rules)
Run sigmalint list-rules for the full catalog; sigmalint explain <ID> for
per-rule documentation.
- uses: ni5h4nt/sigmalint@v0 # floating major tag; tracks the latest 0.x release
with:
path: rules/
format: github
fail-on: error
min-score: 90format: github annotates findings inline on PRs via workflow commands.
Other formats: text (default), json, sarif.
Three built-in profiles tune the rule set for different contexts:
| Profile | Intent |
|---|---|
strict |
Maximum policy enforcement; treats every quality signal as actionable |
sigmahq (default) |
Match SigmaHQ submission expectations |
local |
Internal corpus where ids/authors aren't shared and naming is org-specific |
Override per rule via .sigmalintrc.yml. See docs/profiles.md.
.sigmalintrc.yml in your repo root, all keys optional:
profile: sigmahq
target_sigma_version: 2.1.0 # reserved; multi-version arrives in v0.3
disable: [RED001]
severities:
TAX003: warning
weights:
dimensions:
redundancy: 0.10
fail_on: error
min_score: 90See docs/configuration.md for the full schema.
sigma-cli/ pySigma — schema validation and rule → SIEM conversion. Verify that a rule is well-formed; do not measure quality dimensions.- SigmaHQ contribution pipeline — quality checks specific to the
public-repo submission process (filename conventions,
referencesURL liveness, license markers). Specialized to that workflow; not portable to internal corpora. yaraQA— comparable concept for the sibling YARA rule format. sigmalint applies the same idea to Sigma.
sigmalint is the only tool that scores Sigma rules across multiple quality dimensions with stable, citeable rule IDs.
sigmalint has been empirically evaluated against the full SigmaHQ public corpus: 3,132 production detection rules from SigmaHQ/sigma at Sigma v2.1.0, with a mean target-rule recall of 0.993. External-corpus smoke tests also run weekly in CI. The framework and empirical results are documented in Static Quality Assessment of Sigma Detection Rules: Framework and Empirical Evaluation (SSRN, also via DOI).
The project is citable as software via DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20371168 (see
CITATION.cff), and PyPI releases ship with Sigstore build-provenance
attestations via Trusted Publishing.
- v0.2 — additional rule formats (Splunk SPL detections, Elastic detection rules), expanded false-positive heuristics, optional AI-assisted rule explanations.
- v0.3 — multi-version Sigma support (1.0.x / 2.0.x / 2.1.x), benchmark dataset integration.
- v1.0 — stable rule IDs guaranteed across releases, language plugin API for adding new rule formats out-of-tree.
docs/architecture.md— layered design, condition parser, validity gatedocs/scoring.md— validity gate + weighted quality scoringdocs/profiles.md— per-profile rule severitiesdocs/configuration.md— config schemadocs/versioning.md— semver policy and rule-ID stabilitydocs/maintainers.md— release process and spec-update playbookdocs/rules/<ID>.md— per-rule pages (also surfaced bysigmalint explain)
The headline contribution path is adding a new lint rule — see
CONTRIBUTING.md for the four-step contract (rule class, fixtures, parametrize
entry, doc page). Issues use a structured new rule proposal template.
If you use sigmalint in research, cite via the Zenodo DOI
10.5281/zenodo.20371168
(concept DOI — always resolves to the latest archived version) or via
CITATION.cff.
This implementation accompanies a forthcoming paper, Static Quality Assessment of Sigma Detection Rules: Framework and Empirical Evaluation (preprint pending).
MIT — see LICENSE.
This project is not affiliated with or endorsed by SigmaHQ or The MITRE Corporation. Sigma is a project of SigmaHQ. ATT&CK® is a registered trademark of The MITRE Corporation.