Condition-aware, evidence-traceable retrieval and abstention baseline for maize C4 photosynthesis.
中文说明 · Data card · Methods · Results
C4-EvidenceRAG is a reproducible research prototype that turns a curated maize C4 evidence table into an inspectable retrieval pipeline. It returns claim-level evidence with a claim_id → document_id → DOI → PDF locator trail and applies explicit abstention guardrails when a question exceeds the corpus boundary.
Public release scope: 45 document records, 192 curated claims, 192 evidence-rooted graph edges, and 100 benchmark questions (40 dev / 60 test / 4 abstention items).
- Condition-aware: temperature, water, CO2, light, nitrogen, tissue/cell type, developmental stage, and treatment remain explicit fields.
- Evidence-bound: each result includes a claim, DOI, page/section locator, evidence grade, and context.
- Graph-safe: condition-dependent results are represented as contrasts instead of universal contradictions.
- Abstention-first: unsupported intervention optimization, future-yield extrapolation, cross-species transfer, and raw-image measurement requests are declined.
- Reproducible: Python standard-library baseline; no PDFs, model weights, APIs, or paper text are needed.
git clone https://github.com/HZ-HZAU/c4-evidence-rag.git
cd c4-evidence-rag
python -m unittest discover -s tests -v
python scripts/query.py --question "How does drought change maize photosynthesis under elevated CO2?"
python scripts/evaluate.pyThe query command prints JSON with an answerability status and citation-bound evidence summaries. Results are written to artifacts/.
src/c4_evidence_rag/ retrieval and citation-bound answer compiler
data/ metadata-only claims, document registry, graph, benchmark
docs/ methods, governance, results, release guidance
scripts/ query, evaluation, and release validation
tests/ regression tests
artifacts/ reproducible public-baseline outputs
No source PDFs, figures, tables, full text, verbatim evidence quotations, local paths, reviewer identifiers, model weights, or hidden API calls are included. confirmed is not independent expert consensus, a breeding recommendation, or causal proof beyond the cited study context.
This is a research prototype, not a production agronomy or breeding-decision system. High-priority benchmark review and prior expert adjudication remain pending; see docs/RESULTS.md. Cite this release and each original paper DOI used. See CITATION.cff.
Code: MIT. Project-authored metadata annotations: DATA_LICENSE.md. Third-party publications retain their own licenses.